Jump to Navigation

Recent Case Results

REQUIRED DISCLAIMER: CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE UNDERTAKEN BY A LAWYER.

CRIMINAL DEFENSE CASE RESULTS (see below for traffic/motor vehicle defense case results)

Charge/Background: Malicious Wounding. It was alleged that a dispute between husband and wife turned violent and resulted in one spouse stabbing the other with a knife. The case was charged as felony (class 3) malicious wounding.
Result: Case dismissed at preliminary hearing.

Charge/Background: Client was charged with felony possession with intent to distribute (PWID) illegal drugs.
Result: Case dismissed at preliminary hearing.

Charge/Background: Client was charged with four counts of Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor.
Result: Case dismissed on date of trial.

Charge/Background: Embezzlement. Client retained our services very early in the process and we were able to get the felony embezzlement warrant dismissed (nolle prosed) before it was ever served on the client.
Result: Case dismissed

Charge/Background: Client was involved in a very serious felony Hit and Run offense where several cars were involved and multiple people were injured and transported to the hospital.
Result: Case resolved at preliminary hearing as a misdemeanor with no active jail time and no license suspension.

Charge/Background: Client was charged with seven counts of felony forgery, each of which was punishable by up to 10 years in prison (70 years maximum possible imprisonment).
Result: The seven felony forgery charges reduced to two misdemeanors at preliminary hearing and the client did not have to serve any active jail time.

Charge/Background
: Felony abduction and assault
Result: Case dismissed at preliminary hearing.

Charge/Background: Three felony Burglary/Breaking & Entering charges, 6 felony Destruction of Property charges, and one felony Drug Possession charge.
Result: The case proceeded to trial and client was acquitted (found not guilty) of all felony charges and found guilty of only one misdemeanor. No active jail sentence was imposed despite the fact that active incarceration was sought by the government. Additionally, the restitution amount due was reduced from over $40,000 to under $3,000 as a result of the trial.

Charge/Background: Threat to bomb, felony destruction of property, trespassing.
Result: The Destruction of Property and Trespassing charges were dismissed. An agreement was reached where the Threat to Bomb charge will be reduced to a misdemeanor after two years of probation (which will then be expunged by operation of law under the circumstances of this case).

Charge/Background: Obstruction of Justice
Result: Case proceeded to trial and was dismissed during trial based upon legal arguments we were able to research and present to the judge. However, we did so only after the trial had started so that the state could not recharge the client.

Charge/Background: Two counts of Attempted Carjacking
Result: Case proceeded to preliminary hearing. After cross-examination, and legal and factual arguments we presented (based upon the investigation we performed) the judge dismissed both counts of attempted carjacking.

Charge/Background: Felony Possession with Intent to Distribute Marijuana
Result: Reduced to misdemeanor Possession of Marijuana with no incarceration and no probation.

Charge/Background: Three counts of felony Eluding. Client was involved in a high speed felony chase that proceeded through three separate counties at speeds in excess of 150 miles per hour. This resulted in felony charges of Eluding, Reckless Driving, and Driving on a Suspended License in each of the three counties.
Result: All charges were dismissed in one county while the second county reduced their charges to one misdemeanor with no active jail time. In the remaining county, we were able to convince the judge to limit active jail time to a little over three months despite the fact that the sentencing guidelines called for at least 14 months active incarceration.

Charge/Background: Client was charged with felony Failure to Return Rental Property.
Result: After an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the matter with the prosecutor, the case proceeded to preliminary hearing and through cross-examination, we able to convince the judge to dismiss the case.

Charge/Background: Two felony Concealment of Merchandise charges and four charges of Petit Larceny
Result: Two felony charges and 3 misdemeanor charges were dismissed and the court continued the last misdemeanor charge to be dismissed after a period of 6 months.

Charge/Background: Two felony counts of Procuring Prescription Drugs by Fraud.
Result: One misdemeanor with no active incarceration and probation was limited to six months.

Charge/Background: Possession of Alcohol.
Result: Agreement to dismiss the charge after a period of 6 months.

Charge/Background: Trespassing
Result: Dismissed.

Charge/Background: Client was charged with two counts of domestic assault & battery.  
Result: Charges dismissed.


TRAFFIC/MOTOR VEHICLE DEFENSE CASE RESULTS

Charge/Background: Client was involved in a very serious felony Hit and Run offense where several cars were involved and multiple people were injured and transported to the hospital.
Result: Case resolved at preliminary hearing as a misdemeanor with no active jail time and no license suspension.

Charge/Background: Three Counts of felony Eluding. Client was involved in a high speed felony chase that proceeded through three separate counties at speeds in excess of 150 miles per hour. This resulted in felony charges of Eluding, Reckless Driving, and Driving on a Suspended License in each of the three counties.
Result: All charges were dismissed in one county while the second county reduced their charges to one misdemeanor with no active jail time. In the remaining county, we were able to convince the judge to limit active jail time to a little over three months despite the fact that the sentencing guidelines called for at least 14 months active incarceration.

Charge/Background: DWI
Result: Case dismissed.

Charge/Background: Reckless Driving (46.2-862)
Result: Charge reduced to no-point infraction based upon problems with officer's calibration.

Charge/Background: Reckless Driving, 88 in a 55 MPH zone
Result: Reduced to traffic infraction (74/55).

Charge/Background: Reckless Driving, 90 in a 65 MPH Zone
Result: Reduced to a traffic infraction (74/55) based upon issues we uncovered with the case.

Charge/Background: Aggressive Driving
Result: Reduced to traffic infraction (Improper Driving).

Charge/Background: Driving on a Suspended License & Failure to Obey a Highway Sign
Result: The Driving on a Suspended License was dismissed and we were able to secure a no-point infraction on the Failure to Obey a Highway Sign.

Charge/Background: Reckless Driving, 87 in a 55 MPH zone
Result: Reduced to traffic infraction (74/55).

Charge/Background: DWI, BAC .17 (elevated BAC requiring mandatory active jail time, interlock device, and license suspension)
Result: Reduced to DWI without an elevated BAC, no interlock, no active jail time, and a restricted license effective immediately.

Charge/Background: DWI involving prescription drugs and alcohol.
Result: Case dismissed.

REQUIRED DISCLAIMER: CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE UNDERTAKEN BY A LAWYER.

Client Testimonials

Read more about what our clients have to say about our firm and the quality service and attention to detail that we offer each of our clients.

Testimonial # 1 - "Mr. Manikas worked tirelessly to defend our son and delivered results far beyond our expectations . We highly recommend Mr. Manikas , he is a specialist and professional on both sides our legal system. His experience as a former prosecutor gives his clients an added advantage during the legal defense process. His in-depth knowledge and keen attention to detail leaves no 'stone unturned' when preparing for a case. Kyle Manikas is a rising star attorney that judges are made from! Have no doubt he will give you the best legal service in the state of Virginia ."

Testimonial #2 - "Kyle Manikas is an excellent criminal defense attorney and trial lawyer . He successfully defended a member of my family against multiple unfair felony charges in a complicated case that took several days to try. Mr. Manikas is an incredibly hard worker. He knows the law and prepares meticulously . He made strategic use of legal tools that other lawyers we had consulted never mentioned were available. He is a masterful litigator in the courtroom . In this case, he achieved a remarkably positive outcome , even earning compliments from the judge for his outstanding work. Mr. Manikas also was a skillful negotiator on other unrelated charges. In addition, Kyle was a wise, calming advisor during very stressful times. From the first time we talked with him, he gave us hope . He was always prompt in returning phone calls and kept us well-informed of his progress and thinking. There was never any doubt that he honestly cared about his client and about providing the best possible legal representation that he could. He proved himself to be trustworthy and effective . I have the highest regard for Mr. Manikas and absolutely recommend him to anyone who needs legal help. We couldn't have asked for a better lawyer ."

More Testimonials »

Legal News Headlines


Fairfax, Virginia Office

10513 Judicial Drive, Suite 203
Fairfax, VA 22030
Map and Directions
Phone: 703-873-7473
Toll Free: 888-503-8075

Manikas Law LLC

FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.